Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.

Authors

William A Grobman
Madeline M Rice, George Washington University
Uma M Reddy
Alan T N Tita
Robert M Silver
Gail Mallett
Kim Hill
Elizabeth A Thom, George Washington University
Yasser Y El-Sayed
Annette Perez-Delboy
Dwight J Rouse
George R Saade
Kim A Boggess
Suneet P Chauhan
Jay D Iams
Edward K Chien
Brian M Casey
Ronald S Gibbs
Sindhu K Srinivas
Geeta K Swamy
Hyagriv N Simhan
George A Macones

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

8-9-2018

Journal

The New England journal of medicine

Volume

379

Issue

6

Inclusive Pages

513-523

DOI

10.1056/NEJMoa1800566

Keywords

Adult; Cesarean Section; Female; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Labor Pain; Labor, Induced; Parity; Perinatal Death; Postpartum Hemorrhage; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Risk; Watchful Waiting

APA Citation

Grobman, W., Rice, M., Reddy, U., Tita, A., Silver, R., Mallett, G., Hill, K., Thom, E., El-Sayed, Y., Perez-Delboy, A., Rouse, D., Saade, G., Boggess, K., Chauhan, S., Iams, J., Chien, E., Casey, B., Gibbs, R., Srinivas, S., Swamy, G., Simhan, H., & Macones, G. (2018). Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.. The New England journal of medicine, 379 (6). http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800566

Peer Reviewed

1