"How Can We Better Evaluate Complex Global Health Initiatives? Reflecti" by Sangeeta Mookherji and Kate Meck
 

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

1-1-2015

Journal

Global Health: Science and Practice

Volume

3

Issue

2

Inclusive Pages

174-179

DOI

10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00184

Abstract

An IOM workshop on evaluation design drew on recent evaluations of 4 complex initiatives (PEPFAR; the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria; the President’s Malaria Initiative; and the Affordable Medicines Facility-malaria). Key components for good evaluations: (1) a robust theory of change to understand how and why programs should work; (2) use of multiple analytic methods; and (3) triangulation of evidence to validate and deepen understanding of results as well as synthesis of findings to identify lessons for scale-up or broader application.

Comments

Reproduced with permission of Global Health: Science and Practice.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Peer Reviewed

1

Open Access

1

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Policy Citations: 1
    • Citation Indexes: 2
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 75
    • Abstract Views: 18
  • Captures
    • Readers: 20
see details

Share

COinS