Factors in the technical quality of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism in PIOPED III.

Authors

H. Dirk Sostman, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Kathleen A. Jablonski, George Washington UniversityFollow
Pamela K. Woodard, Washington University, Saint Louis, MOFollow
Paul D. Stein, Michigan State UniversityFollow
David P. Naidich, New York University
Thomas L. Chenevert, University of Michigan
John G. Weg, University of Michigan
Charles A. Hales, Harvard Medical School
Russell D. Hull, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Lawrence R. Goodman, Medical College of Wisconsin
Victor F. Tapson, Duke University

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

2-2012

Journal

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volume

Volume 28, Issue 2

Inclusive Pages

303-312

Keywords

Contrast Media--diagnostic use; Gadolinium DTPA--diagnostic use; Magnetic Resonance Angiography--methods; Meglumine--analogs & derivatives; Organometallic Compounds--diagnostic use; Pulmonary Artery--pathology; Pulmonary Embolism--diagnosis

Comments

This is an open access PubMed Central article. Click on link for full-text access.

APA Citation

Dirk Sostman, H., Jablonski, K. A., Woodard, P. K., Stein, P. D., Naidich, D. P., Chenevert, T. L., . . . Tapson, V. F. (2012). Factors in the technical quality of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism in PIOPED III. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 28(2), 303-312.

Peer Reviewed

1

Open Access

1