Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Journal
PLoS One
Volume
11
Issue
8
Inclusive Pages
e0161045
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0161045
Abstract
BACKGROUND: X&Y chromosomal aneuploidies are among the most common human whole-chromosomal copy number changes, but the population-based incidence and prevalence in the child-bearing population is unclear.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data leveraged a routine non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) using parental genotyping to estimate the population-based incidence of X&Y chromosome variations in this population referred for NIPT (generally due to advanced maternal age).
RESULTS: From 141,916 women and 29,336 men, 119 X&Y chromosomal abnormalities (prevalence: 1 in 1,439) were identified. Maternal findings include: 43 cases of 45,X (40 mosaic); 30 cases of 47,XXX (12 mosaic); 3 cases of 46,XX uniparental disomy; 2 cases of 46,XY/46,XX; 23 cases of mosaicism of unknown type; 2 cases of 47,XX,i(X)(q10). Paternal findings include: 2 cases of 47,XXY (1 mosaic); 10 cases of 47,XYY (1 mosaic); 4 partial Y deletions.
CONCLUSIONS: Single chromosome aneuploidy was present in one of every 1,439 individuals considered in this study, showing 47,XXX; 47,XX,i(X)(q10); 47,XYY; 47,XXY, partial Y deletions, and a high level of mosaicism for 45,X. This expands significantly our understanding of X&Y chromosomal variations and fertility issues, and is critical for families and adults affected by these disorders. This current and extensive information on fertility will be beneficial for genetic counseling on prenatal diagnoses as well as for newly diagnosed postnatal cases.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
APA Citation
Samango-Sprouse, C., Kırkızlar, E., Hall, M., Lawson, P., Demko, Z., Zneimer, S., Curnow, K., Gross, S., & Gropman, A. (2016). Incidence of X and Y Chromosomal Aneuploidy in a Large Child Bearing Population.. PLoS One, 11 (8). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161045
Peer Reviewed
1
Open Access
1
Comments
Reproduced with permission of PLoS ONE.