Biocompatibility of hemodialysis membranes: Interrelations between plasma complement and cytokine levels

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

12-1-2001

Journal

Blood Purification

Volume

19

Issue

4

DOI

10.1159/000046967

Keywords

C3a; C5a; Chronic renal diseases; Complement; Hemodialysis; Interleukin 1; Interleukin 2

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) membrane biocompatibility is defined as absence of complement activation. We have recently shown that circulating levels of interleukin (IL) 1 and IL-2 predict death and survival, respectively, of HD patients. Studies have assessed IL-1 in treatments with biocompatible and less biocompatible dialysis membranes, but no study has correlated circulating levels of all these immunoreactants. We assessed these immunoreactants, and temperature as an outcome, during HD in patients treated with different membranes. Twelve stable patients, receiving thrice-weekly chronic bicarbonate HD, were randomly dialyzed with three different types of membranes, composed of: Cuprophan, cuprammonium rayon modified cellulose, and Hemophan. Blood was drawn from the arterial line port before (Pre) and 15, 30, and 60 min during and after (Post) HD. Patients' temperatures were measured before and after each treatment. The plasma concentrations of IL-1 and IL-2 and factors C3a and C5a were assessed by ELISA. There were no differences between baseline levels of any of the immunoreactants in patients treated with different dialyzers. C3a, C5a, and IL-1 levels increased significantly during HD treatments with all three different membranes. C3a, C5a, and IL-1 levels during Cuprophan and Hemophan treatments were significantly higher than the levels during modified cellulose treatment at 30 and 60 min and Post (p < 0.01). For all the immunoreactants, however, the Post levels were higher than the Pre levels. In contrast to IL-1, there were no differences in mean IL-2 levels during treatments when different membranes were compared. There were few correlations of plasma C3a and C5a levels with plasma IL-1 levels, but there was only one treatment time in one dialyzer group during which IL-2 and any of the other factors were correlated. Pre and Post temperature values and percent change in temperature were not correlated with any of the immunoreactants measured. These data show that C3a, C5a, and IL-1 responses are similar, but not identical, during treatments with different membranes. The response of circulating IL-2 levels to treatments is quite different from that of plasma C3a, C5a and IL-1 levels and suggests that these changes are not solely due to treatment factors. Treatment with modified cellulose membranes is associated with a different immunoreactive profile as compared with patients dialyzed using other cellulose membranes. We suggest that circulating IL-1 levels are good biocompatibility markers. Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS