Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care: A Point-Counterpoint Analysis
Document Type
Editorial
Publication Date
1-1-2026
Journal
Trauma surgery & acute care open
Volume
11
Issue
2
DOI
10.1136/tsaco-2025-002093
Keywords
Health Care Quality, Access, And Evaluation; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; education; general surgery
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) integration in surgical care represents a paradigm shift with significant potential benefits and risks. This point-counterpoint debate examined the proposition that AI improves surgical patient care. A structured debate format featuring Dr Divya Kewalramani (pro-AI) and Dr Michael Aboutanos (con-AI) explored the current state, opportunities, and challenges of AI implementation in surgical practice. The pro-AI argument emphasized addressing surgical care gaps through predictive analytics, supply chain optimization, and enhanced postoperative monitoring. The con-AI position highlighted concerns about data biases, validation deficits, hallucinations, and implementation risks. While AI demonstrates potential to improve surgical care, substantial challenges remain regarding validation, inclusivity, and oversight. Responsible adoption requires robust evaluation frameworks, diverse datasets, and continuous postimplementation monitoring.
APA Citation
Qadri, Saman; Kewalramani, Divya; Aboutanos, Michel B.; Narayan, Mayur; and Quintana, Megan T., "Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care: A Point-Counterpoint Analysis" (2026). GW Authored Works. Paper 9100.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/9100
Department
Surgery