Characteristics and Outcomes of Over One Million Veterans with Heart Failure Phenotyped Using Artificial Intelligence Approaches: The National DCVA-HF Registry
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
4-24-2026
Journal
Journal of cardiac failure
DOI
10.1016/j.cardfail.2026.03.019
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence; Heart Failure; Phenotype; Registry; Veterans
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major heart failure (HF) registries are limited by manual chart abstraction and to hospitalized patients. Using artificial intelligence (AI) approaches and electronic health record (EHR) data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, we have assembled the National DCVA-HF Registry, which includes both ambulatory and hospitalized HF patients. In the current study, we descriptively compared these patients with those identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. METHODS: We identified 1,416,512 Veterans with at least one ICD code for HF in the VA national EHR from 1999 to 2017. The first date of an ICD code for HF was considered the index HF date. We used validated encounter-based AI approaches based on machine learning and natural language processing models, and ICD code-based approaches based on ≥1 hospitalization or ≥2 outpatient encounters due to HF, to assemble the AI-HF and ICD-HF cohorts, respectively. The two cohorts were compared using absolute standardized differences, with values ≥10% indicating clinical significance. All analyses were descriptive, and no inferential or causal claims were made. RESULTS: The AI and ICD approaches assembled 1,031,970 and 614,828 patients, respectively, after a mean of 0.4 and 1.0 years from the index HF date. Patients in the AI-HF (vs. ICD-HF) cohort had a mean age of 71.4 (vs. 70.5) years, 98.1% (vs. 98.0%) were men, 13.9% (vs. 16.1%) were African American, and 7.7% (vs. 13.4%) had index HF hospitalization, with absolute standardized differences of 8%, 1%, 6%, and 18%, respectively, which were <10% for 66 other baseline characteristics. One-year post-index HF hospitalization occurred in 10.7% and 15.6% of patients in the AI-HF and ICD-HF cohorts, respectively. One‑year mortality was lower in the ICD-HF cohort, reflecting expected immortal‑time bias due to later cohort qualification. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this descriptive study demonstrate that the AI approach assembled a substantially larger cohort that included most patients identified using the ICD code approach, suggesting broad consistency between the two approaches. Future external validation is needed to determine its potential utility as a robust tool for improving patient care, health services operations, and clinical research in HF.
APA Citation
Zhang, Sijian; Raman, Venkatesh K.; Shao, Yijun; Patel, Samir; Cheng, Yan; Workman, Terri E.; Sheriff, Helen M.; Fonarow, Gregg C.; Lam, Phillip H.; Heidenreich, Paul A.; Morgan, Charity J.; Moore, Hans J.; Vargas, Jose D.; Vassall, Natalie M.; Arundel, Cherinne; Karasik, Pamela E.; Faselis, Charles; Heimall, Michael S.; Atkins, David; Anker, Stefan D.; Butler, Javed; Filippatos, Gerasimos S.; Wu, Wen-Chih; Zeng-Treitler, Qing; and Ahmed, Ali, "Characteristics and Outcomes of Over One Million Veterans with Heart Failure Phenotyped Using Artificial Intelligence Approaches: The National DCVA-HF Registry" (2026). GW Authored Works. Paper 9018.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/9018
Department
Medicine