Establishing Quality Measures for the Prehospital Pediatric Readiness Project
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
1-21-2026
Journal
Prehospital emergency care
DOI
10.1080/10903127.2026.2617921
Keywords
emergency medical services; pediatric emergency medicine; quality improvement
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Pediatric patients represent a high-risk, low frequency population in emergency medical services (EMS) systems. Quality improvement (QI) is the backbone of high-quality care delivered in EMS and engagement in pediatric-specific QI work is a core domain of the National Prehospital Pediatric Readiness Project (PPRP). There is no widely accepted set of quality measures that focus on the full scope of pediatric prehospital care. Our objective was to establish core PPRP Quality Measures for a National EMS Information System (NEMSIS)-derived pediatric prehospital dashboard to support pediatric QI initiatives. METHODS: We convened a 16-member technical expert panel (TEP) from national professional societies and federal entities. The TEP included physicians, nurses, EMS clinicians, federal partners, state EMS officials, and NEMSIS staff. Candidate measures were identified through a review of national resources and a survey of TEP members. The TEP employed a modified Delphi process to establish consensus priorities and scored measures based on the National Quality Forum Measure Evaluation Criteria. Candidate measures were prioritized based on scientific acceptability, importance to patient outcomes, utility in driving improvements, and feasibility of collection. Candidate measures were scored on a scale of 1 (lowest priority) to 5 (highest priority). Consensus was defined as 75% of the TEP rating a measure ≥ 4. RESULTS: The TEP identified 65 candidate measures. After three rounds of voting, consensus was achieved on 24 measures addressing a range of common pediatric prehospital conditions, including airway management (5 measures), trauma (4), pain control (3), respiratory emergencies (3), cardiac arrest (2), anaphylaxis (1), shock (1), seizures (1), hypoglycemia (1), newborn emergencies (1), non-transport (1), and safe transport (1). Thirteen (54%) of these measures apply to basic life support (BLS) teams. Common reasons for excluding measures included: limited scientific evidence, measure complexity, and redundancy. CONCLUSIONS: A TEP identified 24 quality measures in pediatric EMS that emphasize foundational practice and relevance across a range of volumes and service models. Future validation of these measures with NEMSIS data are needed to establish benchmarks of care across variably resourced EMS agencies and develop effective strategies to support adherence to high-quality pediatric prehospital emergency care.
APA Citation
Ward, Caleb E.; Adelgais, Kathleen; Alter, Rachael; Chaplin, Robert; Cheng, Tabitha; Cicero, Mark; Dietrich, Ann; Frost, Patricia; Genovesi, Andrea L.; Hansen, Matthew; Hewes, Hilary A.; Jaeger, Lindsay R.; Kothari, Kathryn; Martin-Gill, Christian; Murphy, Sheree; Remick, Katherine E.; Walls, Theresa; and Brown, Kathleen M., "Establishing Quality Measures for the Prehospital Pediatric Readiness Project" (2026). GW Authored Works. Paper 8541.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/8541
Department
Pediatrics