A longitudinal mediated examination of legal, commercial, and individual determinants of cannabis and derived cannabis use behaviors and consequences among US young adults

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

10-19-2025

Journal

Addictive behaviors

Volume

172

DOI

10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108526

Keywords

Cannabis; Consequences; Delta-8; Marketing; Policy; Risk perceptions; Use motives

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cannabis and derived intoxicating cannabis product (DICP; e.g., delta-8 tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]) use is increasing, particularly among young adults. We examined how state cannabis and DICP laws and cannabis advertisement exposure impact cannabis/DICP risk perceptions and use motives and how those, in turn, impact cannabis and DICP behaviors (use, frequency, intentions) and consequences. METHODS: We analyzed two waves (2023-2024) of longitudinal survey data among 3,437 US young adults ages 18-34 (∼50 % past-month cannabis use by design). Multivariable regressions assessed direct and indirect associations via parallel mediation. RESULTS: Participants in states with legal (vs. illegal) non-medical cannabis had lower DICP use motives, higher odds of cannabis-only use (vs. neither or both), and used cannabis more frequently; associations with use behaviors were mediated by cannabis/DICP motives and risk perceptions. More restrictive delta-8 THC laws were associated with higher odds of cannabis-only use (vs. neither or both). More digital cannabis ad exposure and less exposure to traditional/store-based ads were associated with lower risk perceptions and higher use motives, odds of cannabis/DICP use, use intentions, and consequences; associations were mediated by cannabis/DICP use motives and/or risk perceptions. Lower cannabis/DICP risk perceptions and higher use motives were associated with higher odds of using each respective substance, co-use, and intentions. Using cannabis/DICPs more frequently was associated with experiencing more cannabis consequences; cannabis/DICP frequency mediated associations of cannabis state laws, advertising exposure, and motives with cannabis consequences. CONCLUSIONS: These pathways underscore how laws and marketing shape use, supporting interventions targeting risk perceptions and motives to reduce harm.

Department

Prevention and Community Health

Share

COinS