Does Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis Lead To Poor Patellofemoral Outcome In ACL Revision On Professional Soccer Players? A minimum 3-year, clinical radiographic retrospective study

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

6-20-2025

Journal

The journal of knee surgery

DOI

10.1055/a-2640-3249

Abstract

BACKGROUND: lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is indicated to decrease the pivot-shift and to restore rotational control in ACL surgery. However, there are concerns regarding the patellofemoral joint, as with increased tension on the iliotibial band, there is a hypothetical increase of lateralizing forces on the lateral patellar surface. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and radiographic patellofemoral outcomes of professional soccer players who underwent LET and ACL revision with a control group of professional soccer players who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS: Retrospective comparative study. Inclusion criteria were professional or elite soccer players with failed ACL reconstruction who underwent ACL revision and LET for anterior laxity > 5 mm and a pivot-shift test > 2. Exclusion criteria were a two-stage procedure, injuries to the contralateral knee, multi-ligament injuries, and patients with less than three years of follow-up. The control group was selected as standard ACL reconstruction with autograft in elite or professional soccer players. All included patients were assessed with a Tegner Lysholm, IKDC and Kujala score. Patients recalled for radiographic patellofemoral assessment with bilateral skyline Merchant view which was compared to the contralateral unaffected knee. RESULTS: Thirty-two consecutive patients (30 in the study group and 34 in the control group) treated from 2015 to 2018 have been included in the study. All patients had a minimum 3-year follow-up, and the mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 2.8 (range: 3 to 7) years. Overall, patients demonstrated significant improvement in measured outcome measures from baseline to final follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups in Kujala,Tegner and Lysholm, and IKDC scores (p>0.05). In the study group, no significant differences in lateral patellar tilt (p>0.05) between treated and unaffected knees was found. CONCLUSIONS: LET represents a reliable solution to increase antero-posterior and rotational stability in revision ACL reconstruction with severe pivot shift. Clinical and radiographical results showed favorable patellofemoral outcomes, with clinical scores comparable to primary surgery and no significant patellar lateralization and degenerative changes.

Department

School of Medicine and Health Sciences Student Works

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS