Saving Shared Decision-Making
Document Type
Editorial
Publication Date
2-14-2025
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
DOI
10.1007/s11606-025-09410-z
Keywords
health communication; medical ethics; patient preference; shared decision-making
Abstract
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality encouraged a re-examination of the concept, process, and measurement of shared decision-making (SDM) in 2016. Progress, however, has been slow. One illustrative example is SDM's relationship with the concept of equipoise: there remains little consensus on what equipoise means in the context of SDM, creating confusion about when SDM is and is not indicated. In this paper, we describe the ways in which this focus on equipoise in SDM is counter-productive and argue that equipoise is neither a necessary nor sufficient criterion in determining the need for SDM. Moreover, we suggest that what is needed to move the field of SDM forward is a shift away from focusing on when SDM is needed to instead focusing on how best to accomplish SDM across a variety of contexts by advancing the science of SDM implementation.
APA Citation
Opel, Douglas J.; Gerstein, Maya T.; Carle, Adam C.; Fournier, Alaina K.; Hargraves, Ian; Lafata, Jennifer E.; Lipstein, Ellen A.; Mallinson, Trudy; Moise, Nathalie; Neuman, Heather B.; Nix, Mary; Papadimitriou, Christina; Scherer, Laura; Sepucha, Karen; Simpson, Matthew; Schwartz, Alan; Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E.; and Dickert, Neal W., "Saving Shared Decision-Making" (2025). GW Authored Works. Paper 6574.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/6574
Department
Clinical Research and Leadership