Factors associated with correction of personal protective equipment nonadherence in a multidisciplinary emergency department setting: A retrospective video review

Authors

Mary S. Kim, Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Aleksandra Sarcevic, College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Genevieve J. Sippel, Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Kathleen H. McCarthy, Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Eleanor A. Wood, College of Medicine, Drexel University Health Sciences Building, Philadelphia, PA.
Carmen Riley, College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Aaron H. Mun, Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Karen J. O'Connell, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Peter T. LaPuma, Department of Environmental & Occupational Health, Milken School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Randall S. Burd, Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC. Electronic address: rburd@childrensnational.org.

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

8-6-2024

Journal

American journal of infection control

DOI

10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.001

Keywords

Emergency care; Infection control; Infection transmission; Practice guidelines; Public health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite local and national recommendations, health care provider adherence to personal protective equipment (PPE) varied during the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies have identified factors influencing initial PPE adherence but did not address factors influencing behaviors leading to correction after initial nonadherence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective video review of 18 pediatric resuscitations involving aerosol-generating procedures from March 2020 to December 2022 to identify factors associated with nonadherence correction. We quantified adherent and nonadherent providers, instances of PPE nonadherence, and time to correction. We also analyzed correction behaviors, including provider actions and correction locations. RESULTS: Among 434 providers, 362 (83%) were nonadherent with at least 1 PPE. Only 186 of 1,832 instances of nonadherence were corrected, primarily upon room entry and during patient care. Correction time varied by PPE type and nonadherence level (incomplete vs absent). Most corrections were self-initiated, with few reminders from other providers. DISCUSSION: Potential barriers to correction include a lack of social pressure and external reminders. Solutions include optimizing PPE availability, providing real-time feedback, and educating on double gloving. CONCLUSIONS: Most providers were nonadherent to PPE requirements during high-risk infection transmission events. The low correction rate suggests challenges in promoting collective responsibility and maintaining protective behaviors during medical emergencies.

APA Citation

Kim, Mary S.; Sarcevic, Aleksandra; Sippel, Genevieve J.; McCarthy, Kathleen H.; Wood, Eleanor A.; Riley, Carmen; Mun, Aaron H.; O'Connell, Karen J.; LaPuma, Peter T.; and Burd, Randall S., "Factors associated with correction of personal protective equipment nonadherence in a multidisciplinary emergency department setting: A retrospective video review" (2024). GW Authored Works. Paper 5508.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/5508

Department

Environmental and Occupational Health