Evaluation of Noise Exposure Levels in Pediatric ENT Operating Rooms
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
6-17-2024
Journal
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
DOI
10.1002/ohn.857
Keywords
hearing loss PS/QI; noise‐induced hearing loss; operative room noise; pediatric otolaryngology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Operating room (OR) sounds may surpass noise exposure thresholds and induce hearing loss. Noise intensity emitted by various surgical instruments during common pediatric otolaryngologic procedures were compared at the ear-level of the surgeon and patient to evaluate the need for quality improvement measures. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single tertiary care center. METHODS: Noise levels were measured using the RISEPRO Sound Level Meter and SoundMeter X 10.0.4 at the ear level of surgeon and patient every 5 minutes. Operative procedure and instrument type were recorded. Measured noise levels were compared against ambient noise levels and the Apple Watch Noise application. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-two total occasions of noise were recorded across 62 surgical cases. Cochlear implantation surgery produces the loudest case at the ear-level of the patient (91.8 Lq Peak dB; P < .001). The otologic drill was the loudest instrument for the patient (92.1 Lq Peak dB; P < .001), while the powered microdebrider was the loudest instrument for the surgeon (90.7 Lq Peak dB; P = .036). Noise measurements between surgeon and patient were similar (P < .05). Overall agreement between the Noise application and Sound Level Meter was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.8, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.32 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Otolaryngology OR noises can surpass normal safe thresholds. Failure to be aware of this may unwittingly expose providers to noise-related hearing loss. Mitigation strategies should be employed. Quality improvement measures, including attention to surgical instrument volume settings and periodic decibel measurements with sound applications, can promote long-term hearing conservation. DISCUSSION: Otolaryngology OR noises can surpass normal safe thresholds. Failure to be aware of this may unwittingly expose providers to noise-related hearing loss. The duration, frequency of exposure, and volume levels of noise should be studied further. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mitigation strategies should be employed. Quality improvement measures, including attention to surgical instrument volume settings and periodic decibel measurements with sound applications, can promote long-term hearing conservation.
APA Citation
Shakhtour, Leyn; Song, Sophia; Orobello, Nicklas C.; Ambrose, Tracey; Rana, Md Sohel; Behzadpour, Hengameh K.; and Reilly, Brian K., "Evaluation of Noise Exposure Levels in Pediatric ENT Operating Rooms" (2024). GW Authored Works. Paper 5092.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/5092
Department
Surgery