Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
5-21-2024
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
DOI
10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00581-6
Abstract
The Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, which revoked the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, has impacted the national medical workforce. Impacts vary across states, but providers in states with restrictive abortion laws now must contend with evolving legal and ethical challenges that have the potential to affect workforce safety, mental health, education, and training opportunities, in addition to having serious impacts on patient health and far-reaching societal consequences. Moreover, Dobbs has consequences on almost every facet of the medical workforce, including on physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and others who work within the health-care system. Comprehensive research is urgently needed to understand the wide-ranging implications of Dobbs on the medical workforce, including legal, ethical, clinical, and psychological dimensions, to inform evidence-based policies and standards of care in abortion-restrictive settings. Lessons from the USA might also have global relevance for countries facing similar restrictions on reproductive care.
APA Citation
Brindis, Claire D.; Laitner, Melissa H.; Clayton, Ellen Wright; Scrimshaw, Susan C.; Grosz, Barbara J.; Simpson, Lisa A.; Rosenbaum, Sara; Brierley, Corale L.; Simon, Melissa A.; Roubideaux, Yvette; Calonge, Bruce N.; Johnson, Paula A.; DeStefano, Laura; Bear, Ashley; Arora, Kavita S.; and Dzau, Victor J., "Health-care workforce implications of the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision" (2024). GW Authored Works. Paper 4901.
https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/gwhpubs/4901
Department
Health Policy and Management