Oxygen saturation thresholds for bronchiolitis at high altitudes: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

3-20-2023

Journal

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research

DOI

10.1080/14737167.2023.2192482

Keywords

Cost‐effectiveness; health economics; high-altitude; oxygen saturation; oxygen therapy; viral bronchiolitis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is evidence suggesting that exaggerated reliance on pulse oximetry (SpO2) and the use of arbitrary/inadequate thresholds of SpO2 might drive unnecessary hospitalizations for viral bronchiolitis, especially among high-altitude residents. The aim of the present study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two oxygen SpO2 thresholds for deciding whether infants with viral bronchiolitis living at high altitudes need hospital admission or can be discharged home. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness study was performed to compare the cost and clinical outcomes of two oxygen SpO2 thresholds, adjusted or not, to an altitude above the sea level of Bogota, Colombia (2640 m), for deciding whether infants with viral bronchiolitis need hospitalization or can be discharged home. The principal outcome was avoidance of hospital admission. RESULTS: Compared to the use of an SpO2 threshold of 90%, using an SpO2 threshold of 85% in infants with viral bronchiolitis was associated with lower overall costs (US$130.4 vs. US$194.0 average cost per patient) and a higher probability of hospitalization avoided (0.7500 vs. 0.5900), thus leading to dominance. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an SpO2 threshold below 90% for deciding on hospitalization in infants with viral bronchiolitis living at high altitudes appears to be logical, secure, and cost-effective.

Department

Pediatrics

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS