Common bile duct stones management: A network meta-analysis

Shahin Mohseni, From the Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery (S.M., M.P.F.), Orebro University Hospital; School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University (S.M., G.A.B., M.P.F.), Orebro, Sweden; Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery (G.A.B.), Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Unidad de Cirugía de Urgencias y Trauma (I.M.C.), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Andalucia, Spain; Division of Acute Care Surgery (M.M.), Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, Uniformed Services University Health Sciences, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (K.A.D.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (E.R.H.), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (E.R.H.), and Department of Emergency Medicine (E.R.H.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Health Policy and Management (E.R.H.), The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Letterkenny Hospital (M.S.), Galway University, Galway, Ireland; UOSD Chirurgia d'Urgenza (H.K.), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Center of Trauma and Critical Care (B.S.), George Washington University, Washington, DC; Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Y.C.), School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Riverside University Health System Medical Center (R.C.); Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine (R.C.), Loma Linda; and Department of Surgery, Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center (R.C.), California.
Gary Alan Bass
Maximilian Peter Forssten
Isidro Martínez Casas
Matthew Martin
Kimberly A. Davis
Elliott R. Haut
Michael Sugrue
Hayato Kurihara
Babak Sarani
Yang Cao
Raul Coimbra

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

11-1-2022

Journal

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery

Volume

93

Issue

5

DOI

10.1097/TA.0000000000003755

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely management is critical for treating symptomatic common bile duct (CBD) stones; however, a single optimal management strategy has yet to be defined in the acute care setting. Consequently, this systematic review and network meta-analysis, comparing one-stage (CBD exploration or intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] with simultaneous cholecystectomy) and two-stage (precholecystectomy or postcholecystectomy ERCP) procedures, was undertaken with the main outcomes of interest being postprocedural complications and hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were methodically queried for articles from 2010 to 2021. The search terms were a combination of medical subject headings terms and the subsequent terms: gallstone; common bile duct (stone); choledocholithiasis; cholecystitis; endoscopic retrograde cholangiography/ERCP; common bile duct exploration; intraoperative, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography; stone extraction; and one-stage and two-stage procedure. Studies that compared two procedures or more were included, whereas studies not recording complications (bile leak, hemorrhage, pancreatitis, perforation, intra-abdominal infections, and other infections) or LOS were excluded. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the four different approaches for managing CBD stones. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies (8,644 participants) addressing the LOS and 41 studies (19,756 participants) addressing postprocedural complications were included in the analysis. The one-stage approaches were associated with a decrease in LOS compared with the two-stage approaches. Common bile duct exploration demonstrated a lower overall risk of complications compared with preoperative ERCP, but there were no differences in the overall risk of complications in the remaining comparisons. However, differences in specific postprocedural complications were detected between the four different approaches managing CBD stones. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis suggests that both laparoscopic CBD exploration and intraoperative ERCP have equally good outcomes and provide a preferable single-anesthesia patient pathway with a shorter overall length of hospital stay compared with the two-stage approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review/Meta Analysis; Level III.

Department

Surgery

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS