Comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T for contrast-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography

Authors

Frank Joseph Londy, University of Michigan
Suzan Lowe, University of Michigan
Paul D. Stein, Michigan State UniversityFollow
John G. Weg, University of Michigan
Robert L. Eisner, Emory University
Kenneth V. Leeper, Emory University
Pamela K. Woodard, Washington University, Saint Louis, MOFollow
H. Dirk Sostman, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Sarah E. Fowler, George Washington University
Kathleen A. Jablonski, George Washington UniversityFollow
Charles A. Hales, Harvard Medical School
Russell D. Hull, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Alexander Gottschalk, Michigan State University
David P. Naidich, New York University
Thomas L. Chenevert, University of Michigan

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

3-2012

Journal

Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Volume

Volume 18, Issue 2

Inclusive Pages

134-139

Keywords

Lung--blood supply; Resonance Angiography--instrumentation; Resonance Angiography--methods; Pulmonary Embolism--diagnosis; Pulmonary Embolism--pathology

Comments

This is an open access PubMed Central article. Click on link for full-text access.

APA Citation

Londy, F. J., Lowe, S., Stein, P. D., Weg, J. G., Eisner, R. L., Leeper, K. V., Woodard, P.K., Sostman, H.D., Jablonski, K.A., Fowler, S.E., Hales, C.A., Hull, R.D., Gottschalk, A., Naidich, D.P., Chenevert, T. L. (2012). Comparison of 1.5 and 3.0 T for contrast-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 18(2), 134-139.

Peer Reviewed

1

Open Access

1