Association of Perceived Benefit or Burden of Research Participation With Participants' Withdrawal From Cancer Clinical Trials
JAMA network open
IMPORTANCE: Attrition in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) can lead to systematic bias, underpowered analyses, and a loss of scientific knowledge to improve treatments. Little attention has focused on retention, especially the role of perceived benefits and burdens, after participants have experienced the trial. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between patients' perceived benefits and burdens of research participation and CCT retention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This survey study was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in the Northeast region of the US. The sample included adult patients with a cancer diagnosis participating in cancer therapeutic trials. Data were collected from September 2015 to June 2019. Analysis of study data was ongoing since November 2019 through October 2022. EXPOSURES: Self-reported validated survey instrument with a list of 22 benefits and 23 burdens of research participation that can be rated by patients with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A primary outcome was actual withdrawal from the CCT, and a composite outcome was composite withdrawal that included both actual withdrawal and thoughts of withdrawing. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used. RESULTS: Among the 334 participants in the sample, the mean (SD) age was 61.9 (11.5) years and 174 women (52.1%) were included. Top-cited benefits included both aspirational and action-oriented goals, including helping others (94.2%), contributing to society (90.3%), being treated respectfully (86.2%), and hoping for a cure (86.0%). Worry over receiving a placebo (61.3%), rearranging one's life (41.9%), and experiencing bothersome adverse effects (41.6%) were notable burdens. An increased burden score was associated with a higher probability of actual withdrawal (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.1-3.17; P = .02) or composite withdrawal (adjusted OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 2.09-5.67; P < .001). An increased benefit score was associated with lower composite withdrawal (adjusted OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.66; P < .001). For participants who reported the benefits as being equal to or greater than the burdens, 13.4% withdrew. For those who perceived the benefits as being less than the burdens, 33.3% withdrew (adjusted OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.13-10.14; P = .03). The risk of withdrawal was even higher for the composite outcome (adjusted OR, 7.70; 95% CI, 2.76-21.48; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This survey study found that patients perceived important benefits from CCT participation, and this perception was associated with trial retention, even among those who also perceived substantial burdens. A broader dialogue among stakeholders can inform an ethical and patient-centric focus on benefits throughout the course of a CCT to increase retention.
Ulrich, Connie M.; Ratcliffe, Sarah J.; Zhou, Qiuping; Huang, Liming; Hochheimer, Camille; Gordon, Thomas; Knafl, Kathleen; Miller, Victoria; Naylor, Mary D.; Schapira, Marilyn M.; Richmond, Therese S.; Grady, Christine; and Mao, Jun J., "Association of Perceived Benefit or Burden of Research Participation With Participants' Withdrawal From Cancer Clinical Trials" (2022). GW Authored Works. Paper 1987.
Nursing Faculty Publications